<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><TEI xmlns="http://www.tei-c.org/ns/1.0"><teiHeader><fileDesc><titleStmt><title type="full"><title type="main">Features of Timelessness</title><title type="sub">Intermediate Report on a Quest for Stylistic Features that Mark Literary Canonicity</title></title></titleStmt><author><persName><surname>Van Zundert</surname><forename>Joris J.</forename></persName><affiliation>Department of Literary Studies, Huygens Institute for the History of the Netherlands – Royal Netherlands Academy of Arts and Sciences. Amsterdam, The Netherlands</affiliation><email>joris.van.zundert@huygens.knaw.nl</email></author><author><persName><surname>Mar</surname><forename>Raymond A.</forename></persName><affiliation>Department of Psychology, York University. Toronto, Canada</affiliation></author><author><persName><surname>van Dalen–Oskam</surname><forename>Karina</forename></persName><affiliation>Department of Literary Studies, Huygens Institute for the History of the Netherlands – Royal Netherlands Academy of Arts and Sciences. Amsterdam, The Netherlands</affiliation><affiliation>Faculty of Humanities, University of Amsterdam. Amsterdam, The Netherlands</affiliation></author><author><persName><surname>Temple</surname><forename>Emily</forename></persName><affiliation>Literary Hub</affiliation></author><author><persName><surname>Bowman</surname><forename>Isabel</forename></persName><affiliation>Department of Psychology, University of Toronto. Toronto, Canada</affiliation></author><author><persName><surname>Heidari</surname><forename>Farzaneh</forename></persName><affiliation>Department of Electrical Engineering and Computer Sciences, York University. Toronto, Canada</affiliation></author><author><persName><surname>Nguyen</surname><forename>Ahn T.P.</forename></persName><affiliation>Department of Psychology, York University. Toronto, Canada</affiliation></author><editionStmt><edition><date>43916</date></edition></editionStmt><publicationStmt><publisher>Name, Institution</publisher><address><addrLine>Street</addrLine><addrLine>City</addrLine><addrLine>Country</addrLine><addrLine>Name</addrLine></address></publicationStmt><sourceDesc><p>Converted from an OASIS Open Document</p></sourceDesc></fileDesc><encodingDesc><appInfo><application ident="DHCONVALIDATOR" version="1.22"><label>DHConvalidator</label></application></appInfo></encodingDesc><profileDesc><textClass><keywords scheme="ConfTool" n="category"><term>Paper</term></keywords><keywords scheme="ConfTool" n="subcategory"><term>Short Presentation</term></keywords><keywords scheme="ConfTool" n="keywords"><term>stylometry</term><term>literature</term><term>features</term><term>canonicity</term></keywords><keywords scheme="ConfTool" n="topics"><term>Europe</term><term>English</term><term>North America</term><term>20th Century</term><term>Contemporary</term><term>attribution studies and stylometric analysis</term><term>Humanities computing</term><term>Literary studies</term></keywords></textClass></profileDesc></teiHeader><text><body><p>We report on our ongoing quest to establish a validated complex of stylistic features that act as markers for literary canonicity, in specific contexts. Currentely we present a stylometric analysis of literature investigating the stylistic markers that differentiate former bestsellers from fiction that remains popular across several decades using a TfIdf vectorization of texts and UMAP dimenision reduction approach. We find that especially a greater variation in sentence length is associated with the chances of a novel to remain popular.</p></body></text></TEI>